Over 70% of participants said they would consider accepting an adjusted offer if it was clearly explained and didn’t require re-entering all data.
- Surveyed users to identify how they react to rejection: would they accept modified conditions or switch to a competitor?
- Conducted hallway usability testing with 27 participants — observing their behavior and emotional response during the loan process.
- Analyzed product metrics: total applications, drop-offs, CTA interactions, and rejection points.
2. Flexible range after approval
In approved cases, users can now adjust the loan amount within the approved limit, giving them more control and personalization.
- increase approval rates,
- reduce user churn,
- and grow the total number of issued loans.
If we provided personalized alternative options (e.g., smaller amount, longer term, or, for reliable clients, a higher approved limit), we could:
The main reason for rejection was a mismatch between the requested amount and the available loan term. Users faced a dead end — they either had to restart the entire application with new parameters or abandon the process altogether.
The online credit flow suffered from a high drop-off rate at the final stage — especially after loan rejections. This behavior was predictable, but it also revealed a major opportunity: users who received a refusal were completely leaving the product instead of adjusting their loan request.
1. Alternative offers after rejection
When a user’s loan request is declined, the system now automatically generates alternative scenarios — e.g., smaller amounts or longer terms — allowing users to proceed without restarting the process.